<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pacquiao vs Mayweather: take it to the ring, guys!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reappropriate.com/2009/12/29/pacquiao-vs-mayweather-take-it-to-the-ring-guys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reappropriate.com/2009/12/29/pacquiao-vs-mayweather-take-it-to-the-ring-guys/</link>
	<description>writings of an Asian American feminist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 03:32:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Floyd Mayweather&#8217;s Racist, Anti-Asian Rant Against Manny Pacquiao Caught on Tape &#171; reappropriate</title>
		<link>http://www.reappropriate.com/2009/12/29/pacquiao-vs-mayweather-take-it-to-the-ring-guys/comment-page-1/#comment-8081</link>
		<dc:creator>Floyd Mayweather&#8217;s Racist, Anti-Asian Rant Against Manny Pacquiao Caught on Tape &#171; reappropriate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 01:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reappropriate.com/?p=344#comment-8081</guid>
		<description>[...] those of you who read this blog regularly know that I&#8217;m a fan of boxing, and that I was pretty excited about a Pacquiao/Mayweather fight that was set to take place earlier this year. Mayweather, who is undoubtedly one of the best boxers of our generation was slated to fight [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] those of you who read this blog regularly know that I&#8217;m a fan of boxing, and that I was pretty excited about a Pacquiao/Mayweather fight that was set to take place earlier this year. Mayweather, who is undoubtedly one of the best boxers of our generation was slated to fight [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Carolla Apologizes for Being a Racist Asshat &#171; reappropriate</title>
		<link>http://www.reappropriate.com/2009/12/29/pacquiao-vs-mayweather-take-it-to-the-ring-guys/comment-page-1/#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Carolla Apologizes for Being a Racist Asshat &#171; reappropriate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 23:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reappropriate.com/?p=344#comment-258</guid>
		<description>[...] a breathtaking display of sheer ass-hattery, Carolla called boxer Manny Pacquiao a &#8220;fuckin&#8217; idiot&#8221; and described the Phillipines as little more than a collection [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a breathtaking display of sheer ass-hattery, Carolla called boxer Manny Pacquiao a &#8220;fuckin&#8217; idiot&#8221; and described the Phillipines as little more than a collection [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.reappropriate.com/2009/12/29/pacquiao-vs-mayweather-take-it-to-the-ring-guys/comment-page-1/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 02:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reappropriate.com/?p=344#comment-250</guid>
		<description>Forget what I posted hopefully the fight will get underway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forget what I posted hopefully the fight will get underway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.reappropriate.com/2009/12/29/pacquiao-vs-mayweather-take-it-to-the-ring-guys/comment-page-1/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 05:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reappropriate.com/?p=344#comment-249</guid>
		<description>@Ken

Larry Merchant isn&#039;t a group of experts he is a sports commentator who has never trained as a fighter, trained fighters, or fought professionally; who often runs his mouth for the sake of running his mouth.

.2) [quote]you said what Pacman did has never been done before in boxing in your 1st post on this subject.[/quote]

Wrong, I said and I QUOTE:

[quote]No offense Jenn, but Pacquiao did go up 7 weight classes, with no real signs of it affecting his speed, power, or reaction time.[/quote]

Now out of the people you mentioned only Oscar De La Hoya managed to go up 7 classes but failed to maintain his speed, power and reaction time.

Henry Armstrong: Debuted at 120 pounds, won world titles at 126, 135, tanked@147

Alexis Arguello: Won titles at 126, 130, 135 and 140.

Oscar De La Hoya: Debuted at 133, won world titles at 130, 135, 140, 147, 154 tanked@160.

Roberto Duran: Debuted at 118, won titles at 135, 147, 154, tanked@160

Tommy Hearns: Debuted at 147, won titles at 147, 154, 160, 168 tanked@175.

Sugar Ray Leonard: Debuted at 141, won titles at 147, 154, 160 tanked@168

Sugar Ray Robinson: Debuted at 134, won titles at 147, 160, tanked@175

Their is a reason why professional fighters don&#039;t rely on building muscles like body builders.

And Pacquiao struggled a little at 112 although I don&#039;t really hold that against him

It&#039;s Funny how you dismiss Mayweather as a fighter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ken</p>
<p>Larry Merchant isn&#8217;t a group of experts he is a sports commentator who has never trained as a fighter, trained fighters, or fought professionally; who often runs his mouth for the sake of running his mouth.</p>
<p>.2) [quote]you said what Pacman did has never been done before in boxing in your 1st post on this subject.[/quote]</p>
<p>Wrong, I said and I QUOTE:</p>
<p>[quote]No offense Jenn, but Pacquiao did go up 7 weight classes, with no real signs of it affecting his speed, power, or reaction time.[/quote]</p>
<p>Now out of the people you mentioned only Oscar De La Hoya managed to go up 7 classes but failed to maintain his speed, power and reaction time.</p>
<p>Henry Armstrong: Debuted at 120 pounds, won world titles at 126, 135, tanked@147</p>
<p>Alexis Arguello: Won titles at 126, 130, 135 and 140.</p>
<p>Oscar De La Hoya: Debuted at 133, won world titles at 130, 135, 140, 147, 154 tanked@160.</p>
<p>Roberto Duran: Debuted at 118, won titles at 135, 147, 154, tanked@160</p>
<p>Tommy Hearns: Debuted at 147, won titles at 147, 154, 160, 168 tanked@175.</p>
<p>Sugar Ray Leonard: Debuted at 141, won titles at 147, 154, 160 tanked@168</p>
<p>Sugar Ray Robinson: Debuted at 134, won titles at 147, 160, tanked@175</p>
<p>Their is a reason why professional fighters don&#8217;t rely on building muscles like body builders.</p>
<p>And Pacquiao struggled a little at 112 although I don&#8217;t really hold that against him</p>
<p>It&#8217;s Funny how you dismiss Mayweather as a fighter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.reappropriate.com/2009/12/29/pacquiao-vs-mayweather-take-it-to-the-ring-guys/comment-page-1/#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 20:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reappropriate.com/?p=344#comment-259</guid>
		<description>@Keith

Mayweather didn&#039;t go pro like Pacman did at 16 he was still in the amateurs. But they were at the same weight at the same age, but 1 had access to all the nutritious food in a 1st world country while Pacman was malnourished and fighting for survival in a 3rd world country. But both of them also gain weight throught the years.

What weight did Pacman struggle at when he went up? 122? 126? 130? BTW, you said what Pacman did has never been done before in boxing in your 1st post on this subject. Roberto Duran, Sugar Ray Robinson, and Hank Armstrong did it. They kept their power and speed in the case of the latter 2. Were they on PEDs also? Just in their case there wasn&#039;t 17 weight classes today. Of course if Pacman was fighting in their time, he wouldn&#039;t be a 7 weight champ, but it has been done before.

Even Larry Merchant and boxing experts said what Pacman did has been done before, the mainstream media is acting like it&#039;s never been done because of the modern standard of 7 weight classes and therefore it&#039;s suspicious, but it&#039;s not suspicious for all time great fighters have done it in the past. That&#039;s the article. You&#039;re saying you know more than boxing experts?

http://boxing.fanhouse.com/2010/01/03/hbos-larry-merchant-on-floyd-mayweather-manny-pacquiao/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Keith</p>
<p>Mayweather didn&#8217;t go pro like Pacman did at 16 he was still in the amateurs. But they were at the same weight at the same age, but 1 had access to all the nutritious food in a 1st world country while Pacman was malnourished and fighting for survival in a 3rd world country. But both of them also gain weight throught the years.</p>
<p>What weight did Pacman struggle at when he went up? 122? 126? 130? BTW, you said what Pacman did has never been done before in boxing in your 1st post on this subject. Roberto Duran, Sugar Ray Robinson, and Hank Armstrong did it. They kept their power and speed in the case of the latter 2. Were they on PEDs also? Just in their case there wasn&#8217;t 17 weight classes today. Of course if Pacman was fighting in their time, he wouldn&#8217;t be a 7 weight champ, but it has been done before.</p>
<p>Even Larry Merchant and boxing experts said what Pacman did has been done before, the mainstream media is acting like it&#8217;s never been done because of the modern standard of 7 weight classes and therefore it&#8217;s suspicious, but it&#8217;s not suspicious for all time great fighters have done it in the past. That&#8217;s the article. You&#8217;re saying you know more than boxing experts?</p>
<p><a href="http://boxing.fanhouse.com/2010/01/03/hbos-larry-merchant-on-floyd-mayweather-manny-pacquiao/" rel="nofollow">http://boxing.fanhouse.com/2010/01/03/hbos-larry-merchant-on-floyd-mayweather-manny-pacquiao/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.reappropriate.com/2009/12/29/pacquiao-vs-mayweather-take-it-to-the-ring-guys/comment-page-1/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 22:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reappropriate.com/?p=344#comment-260</guid>
		<description>@Ken - Can you be anymore of a hypocrite? and for the record Mayweather didn&#039;t go up 7 weight classes like Pacquiao did, and Pacquiao struggled early when he first went up a weight class at that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ken &#8211; Can you be anymore of a hypocrite? and for the record Mayweather didn&#8217;t go up 7 weight classes like Pacquiao did, and Pacquiao struggled early when he first went up a weight class at that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.reappropriate.com/2009/12/29/pacquiao-vs-mayweather-take-it-to-the-ring-guys/comment-page-1/#comment-248</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 03:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reappropriate.com/?p=344#comment-248</guid>
		<description>Floyd is undefeated because for years he has ducked the best welterweights. The best welterweight he has fought was against Baldomir, a crap champion. Being undefeated doesn&#039;t mean anything if you don&#039;t face the challenges out there. Floyd ducked Margarito, Cotto, Mosley, Paul Williams. He fought a fat old Marquez that had to jump up 2 weight classes and is praise for it.

Manny on the other hand fights Cotto, and now they are saying Cotto was damaged goods and weight drain. They said Hatton was shot, they said De La hoya was shot and weight drain. They then said Morales was shot when Manny beats him twice. They also said Barrera was shot when Manny beat him. Then you throw in the PED issue and all of his accomplishments are being erased. Gotta love the American media.

BTW, Manny was a 16 year old kid when he started boxing at 106. Your body changes as you get older, it&#039;s not PEDs folks. Mayweather was 106 at the same age and fought at 154 but no one says anything about that. It&#039;s funny when an Asian male does it, he&#039;s on steroids and fights past their prime fighters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Floyd is undefeated because for years he has ducked the best welterweights. The best welterweight he has fought was against Baldomir, a crap champion. Being undefeated doesn&#8217;t mean anything if you don&#8217;t face the challenges out there. Floyd ducked Margarito, Cotto, Mosley, Paul Williams. He fought a fat old Marquez that had to jump up 2 weight classes and is praise for it.</p>
<p>Manny on the other hand fights Cotto, and now they are saying Cotto was damaged goods and weight drain. They said Hatton was shot, they said De La hoya was shot and weight drain. They then said Morales was shot when Manny beats him twice. They also said Barrera was shot when Manny beat him. Then you throw in the PED issue and all of his accomplishments are being erased. Gotta love the American media.</p>
<p>BTW, Manny was a 16 year old kid when he started boxing at 106. Your body changes as you get older, it&#8217;s not PEDs folks. Mayweather was 106 at the same age and fought at 154 but no one says anything about that. It&#8217;s funny when an Asian male does it, he&#8217;s on steroids and fights past their prime fighters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigWOWO</title>
		<link>http://www.reappropriate.com/2009/12/29/pacquiao-vs-mayweather-take-it-to-the-ring-guys/comment-page-1/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>bigWOWO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 18:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reappropriate.com/?p=344#comment-247</guid>
		<description>&quot;Consider: Floyd Mayweather ‘retires’ after beating de la Hoya and practically everyone else of note available, and only a few months go by before boxing decides that Manny Pacquiao can eliminate their Negro problem. Don’t agree? Well, boxing has a history of seeking out White champions to sell tickets to White fans who desire a great White hope. Pacquiao’s been a great fighter for a long, long time. Why sell him as the post-racial Rocky?&quot;

So basically you&#039;re saying that they&#039;re hyping Pacquiao only because the media likens him to a White man and wants to get rid of a black guy?  I hadn&#039;t heard that theory before.  I guess I&#039;m happy that the American media, according to your theory, likens us to White people.  Hopefully that&#039;ll result in more of us getting acting jobs in Hollywood.

Mayweather is scared of Pacquiao.  I don&#039;t know who would win, but it&#039;s clear that he&#039;s trying to avoid the Pac-Man&#039;s power.  It looks like the fight is off again:

http://www.upi.com/Sports_News/2010/01/07/Pacquiao-Mayweather-fight-off-again/UPI-43091262887258/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Consider: Floyd Mayweather ‘retires’ after beating de la Hoya and practically everyone else of note available, and only a few months go by before boxing decides that Manny Pacquiao can eliminate their Negro problem. Don’t agree? Well, boxing has a history of seeking out White champions to sell tickets to White fans who desire a great White hope. Pacquiao’s been a great fighter for a long, long time. Why sell him as the post-racial Rocky?&#8221;</p>
<p>So basically you&#8217;re saying that they&#8217;re hyping Pacquiao only because the media likens him to a White man and wants to get rid of a black guy?  I hadn&#8217;t heard that theory before.  I guess I&#8217;m happy that the American media, according to your theory, likens us to White people.  Hopefully that&#8217;ll result in more of us getting acting jobs in Hollywood.</p>
<p>Mayweather is scared of Pacquiao.  I don&#8217;t know who would win, but it&#8217;s clear that he&#8217;s trying to avoid the Pac-Man&#8217;s power.  It looks like the fight is off again:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.upi.com/Sports_News/2010/01/07/Pacquiao-Mayweather-fight-off-again/UPI-43091262887258/" rel="nofollow">http://www.upi.com/Sports_News/2010/01/07/Pacquiao-Mayweather-fight-off-again/UPI-43091262887258/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Odilia Goucher</title>
		<link>http://www.reappropriate.com/2009/12/29/pacquiao-vs-mayweather-take-it-to-the-ring-guys/comment-page-1/#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>Odilia Goucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 18:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reappropriate.com/?p=344#comment-252</guid>
		<description>This is when the UFC needs the fans support the most. If you call yourself a real MMA fan then you support the sport through the good times and the bad times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is when the UFC needs the fans support the most. If you call yourself a real MMA fan then you support the sport through the good times and the bad times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.reappropriate.com/2009/12/29/pacquiao-vs-mayweather-take-it-to-the-ring-guys/comment-page-1/#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 22:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reappropriate.com/?p=344#comment-253</guid>
		<description>Look. Mayweather is the best boxer in the world today. Period. Manny Pacquiao is a great boxer, and has been for years. But Floyd Mayweather is the best. Everyone&#039;s beaten Oscar de la Hoya at least once, so the fact that Pacquiao&#039;s elevation to prominence has occurred after that fight says to me that this is another example of the boxing world attempting to revive itself with a blockbuster event.

Consider: Floyd Mayweather &#039;retires&#039; after beating de la Hoya and practically everyone else of note available, and only a few months go by before boxing decides that Manny Pacquiao can eliminate their Negro problem. Don&#039;t agree? Well, boxing has a history of seeking out White champions to sell tickets to White fans who desire a great White hope. Pacquiao&#039;s been a great fighter for a long, long time. Why sell him as the post-racial Rocky?

Because Black boxing champions have never made Americans comfortable, and every chance professional boxing has had to promote a non-Black champion, it&#039;s made a lot of money (remember the Klitchscko brothers, anyone?). So send Manny Pacquiao up against Mayweather, why not? But amid all the Asian American pride, let&#039;s hope people recognize that eliminating a Black champion from the ranks of boxing&#039;s greats pays the bills for this fight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look. Mayweather is the best boxer in the world today. Period. Manny Pacquiao is a great boxer, and has been for years. But Floyd Mayweather is the best. Everyone&#8217;s beaten Oscar de la Hoya at least once, so the fact that Pacquiao&#8217;s elevation to prominence has occurred after that fight says to me that this is another example of the boxing world attempting to revive itself with a blockbuster event.</p>
<p>Consider: Floyd Mayweather &#8216;retires&#8217; after beating de la Hoya and practically everyone else of note available, and only a few months go by before boxing decides that Manny Pacquiao can eliminate their Negro problem. Don&#8217;t agree? Well, boxing has a history of seeking out White champions to sell tickets to White fans who desire a great White hope. Pacquiao&#8217;s been a great fighter for a long, long time. Why sell him as the post-racial Rocky?</p>
<p>Because Black boxing champions have never made Americans comfortable, and every chance professional boxing has had to promote a non-Black champion, it&#8217;s made a lot of money (remember the Klitchscko brothers, anyone?). So send Manny Pacquiao up against Mayweather, why not? But amid all the Asian American pride, let&#8217;s hope people recognize that eliminating a Black champion from the ranks of boxing&#8217;s greats pays the bills for this fight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
